2016美國總統大選》川普現象觀察:美國反智主義氾濫的真相

 

美國共和黨總統候選人川普(Donald Trump)揚言,若當選總統,將在美墨兩國邊境修建一堵高牆,阻擋墨西哥移民,還要讓墨西哥政府買單。他的「驚人之語」至今仍讓世人津津樂道。

共和黨總統候選人川普。(美聯社)
共和黨總統候選人川普。(美聯社)

當初沒人把川普說的話當回事,認為只是他這個「嘴砲」商人兼實境秀主持人,為了吸引注意的反智言論,最終只會是曇花一現。想不到,一年多來,他正是靠著這種「胡言亂語」一路過關斬將,不但殺出重圍成為共和黨總統候選人,而且頻頻靠著「泥巴戰術」把民主黨總統候選人希拉蕊(Hillary Clinton)搞得狼狽不堪。

川普支持者。(美聯社)
川普支持者。(美聯社)

當然,希拉蕊也有讓人側目的言論,例如說,她曾公開稱川普的支持者中有半數是「一籮筐的可悲之人」,引來強烈批評。此外,她還稱川普是俄羅斯總統普京(Vladimir Putin)的傀儡,奧蘭多夜店槍擊案的兇手就是來自川普的老家等等的言論。

川普支持者穿著「上帝、槍枝、川普」標語的T恤。(美聯社)
川普支持者穿著「上帝、槍枝、川普」標語的T恤。(美聯社)

川普現象與美國根深蒂固的反智傳統

川普的小粉絲扮成他的樣子,到造勢場合表達支持。(美聯社)
川普的小粉絲扮成他的樣子,到造勢場合表達支持。(美聯社)

究竟「川普現象」的本質是什麼?反智主義是其中一大特徵,川普的口無遮攔,說些蠱惑人心的話,提出荒誕的建議,經常讓人覺得他馬上就要被「三振出局」,沒想到卻一路勝利,直衝總統大位 。

美國歷史學家霍夫斯達(Richard Hofstadter)在其《美國生活中的反智主義》(Anti-Intellectualism in American Life)一書中指出,美國人有著根深蒂固的反智主義傳統,呈現像在兩個方面:對於知識的反對或懷疑和對於知識分子的懷疑和鄙視。

川普支持者身披川普的旗幟,到造勢場合力挺他。(美聯社)
川普支持者身披川普的旗幟,到造勢場合力挺他。(美聯社)

然而選舉的初衷卻是,選出一個對人民負責、對國家負責,有智慧、有能力的領袖。而反智主義卻反其道而行之,因此為了迎合這種反智傳統,政客們各出奇招。他們有些是「真傻」,有些是「裝傻」,或是兼而有之,但目的都是為了搶選票,為了贏得選舉,他們可以裝瘋賣傻,沒有底線。

川普支持者到造勢場合為他加油。(美聯社)
川普支持者到造勢場合為他加油。(美聯社)

縱觀美國選舉歷史不難看出,反智主義並非川普「獨家秘訣」,而是源遠流長。有學者分析發現,自上世紀60年代開始,美國政治反智主義的傾向暗流洶湧,他們反對書本、反對知識、反對媒體,有些政客把自己塑造成「無知愛國」的代言人。

美國共和黨保守派大咖、阿拉斯加州前州長裴林(美聯社)
美國共和黨保守派大咖、阿拉斯加州前州長裴林(美聯社)

舉例而言, 2008年美國總統選舉,共和黨推出保守派前阿拉斯加州州長裴林(Sarah Palin)為副總統候選人,她反智傾向讓她快速走紅,她對對國內和國際事務幾乎一無所知,最有名的政見是,要把1200萬居留美國的非法移民拘捕遣送,把伊拉克戰爭稱之為「上帝賦予的任務」。

在網路新媒體時代,反智主義又有了新功能,那就是能讓政客瞬間成為「網路紅人」,吸引選票。例如川普就曾在推特上轉發義大利獨裁者墨索里尼的名言,當媒體追問此事時,他說:「這是誰的名言並不重要,重要的是能得到關注」。當然,希拉蕊也不甘示弱,不時拿川普的髮型與花邊新聞「開刀」,吸引民眾關注。

美國「反智」與歐洲「反體制」異曲同工

川普支持者幫自己的孩子帶上川普面具。(美聯社)
川普支持者幫自己的孩子帶上川普面具。(美聯社)

英國《金融時報》網站刊文指出,全球政治正轉變成「體制派」與「反體制」之間的對抗。在西歐的許多國家也出現同樣的模式,反體制的政黨抬頭,比如義大利五星運動黨、法國國民陣線、西班牙極左派的「我們可以黨」(Podemos)和德國右翼民族主義的另類選擇黨(AFD)等。

反智主義與反體制思潮異曲同工,「川普現象」所代表的反智和孤立主義思潮,本身也是今天美國選民對經濟、生存和安全恐懼的折射。美國貧富分化加劇,財富向少數人手裡集中。皮尤研究中心(Pew Research Center)的最新研究顯示,美國中產階級家庭所佔比例從1971年的61%減少到目前僅有49.4%。同時,2014年美國總收入的43%進入中產階級家庭,大幅低於1970年的62%;總收入的49%進入富裕家庭,大幅高於1970年的29%。

實際上,「反智主義」反的不是「智」,而是「有智的人」「有錢的人」,本質是平民階層對於精英主義的反抗。當人民對於現狀不滿時,便加深對政治精英的厭惡和不信任,參與投票往往只是為了賭氣,而非做出最有利的選擇。

美國總統大選共和黨候選人川普5日在佛羅里達州造勢(AP)
美國總統大選共和黨候選人川普5日在佛羅里達州造勢(AP)

在這場選舉中,對共和黨的批評也不少於川普,認為共和黨大方擁抱這種反智現象,利用其作為他們達成政治目標的手段。美國外交關係委員會(CFR)資深研究員布特(Max. Boot)就在《紐約時報》的投書指出,有人開玩笑說,「川普現象」是共和黨數十年來「裝笨」導致的後果,但若川普不幸當選,到時所有人都笑不出來。

即便川普沒能當選,也會為共和黨帶來「後遺症」,他們必須重新檢視黨內不斷滋長的反智現象,若只一味迎合民粹憤怒,擁抱極端分子絕對不是維持一個政黨的長久之計。

川普像是個賣藥商人,宣稱自己的仙丹妙藥可以救活奄奄一息的美國,讓她再次強大。(美聯社)
川普像是個賣藥商人,宣稱自己的仙丹妙藥可以救活奄奄一息的美國,讓她再次強大。(美聯社)

 

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Samsung Galaxy Note 7: The unanswered questions

 
Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption All Galaxy Note 7s are being recalled after a minority overheated

Samsung's second recall of its Galaxy Note 7 handsets is an unprecedented disaster for the company and the wider mobile phone sector.

There have been huge battery-related recalls before - Nokia had to ask consumers to send back 46 million batteries in 2007 because of overheating fears, but because they were removable it did not mean a well-reviewed flagship had to be scrapped.

"Stop using your device, back up your data and switch it off," the Samsung told Note 7 owners the day after it confirmed it had shut down its assembly lines following a spate of fires.

A compensation scheme is being put in place - users will be offered the choice of either getting all their money back or swapping the phablet for an older, smaller-screened Galaxy S7 or S7 Edge phone plus a partial refund.

But several questions remain unanswered.


What caused the handsets to self-combust?

 
Image copyright AP
Image caption One of the handsets caught fire on a table in Richmond, Virginia

When Samsung instituted the initial recall last month, it pointed to a "battery cell issue" being the cause.

A report sent by the company to regulators was more specific, saying a production fault had caused some of the batteries to be slightly larger than intended, which had put pressure on them when they were fitted inside phones, according to a leak reported by Bloomberg.

The issue was blamed on the components' manufacturer - Samsung SDI - and was supposed to have been fixed by putting batteries made by another company, ATL, in the replacements.

Now that several of that second batch of phones have overheated too, it is unclear whether the original problem was misdiagnosed.

According to the New York Times, Samsung's engineers were never able to get the phones to explode when they tried to recreate the fault.

"We are working with relevant regulatory bodies to investigate the recently reported cases involving the Galaxy Note 7," was the only comment a Samsung spokesman was willing to make on the matter.


How many Note 7s were made, and how many exploded?

 
Image copyright EPA
Image caption Some reviews had described the Note 7 as being the best Android handset to date

Samsung has yet to reveal exactly how many Note 7s it made before pulling the plug on Tuesday.

On 2 September, the South Korean company said 2.5 million devices were subject to its initial recall.

On 27 September, it added that more than 60% of the Note 7s that had been sold in South Korea and the US had been replaced with new devices.

Those two countries accounted for the vast majority of the phones sold - only about 50,000 devices made it to Europe.

And the Note 7 only briefly returned to sale to new customers in South Korea last week.

All of which gives a rough tally of four million units.

IHS had originally forecast Samsung would have made about six million Note 7s by this point if all had gone according to plan.

It is less clear how many actually overheated

Samsung said it had received "35 reported claims" at the time of the first recall, and there were seven reports in the media of replacement models being affected.


What happens now to all the handsets?

 
Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption Samsung is sending out fire-proof boxes for customers to return the handsets

Samsung has said it will take "all measures" to get the devices back.

For now, that involves sending emails and notifications to registered users.

At the time of the original recall, it also issued a software update that prevented some of the batteries from being fully recharged.

There is speculation that other restrictions - or a full lockout - could be imposed if users now refuse to give the devices up.

There is also the question of what Samsung does with the mountain of returned mobiles.

A spokesman declined to say whether it might strip them down and re-use components in other products.

But one environmental pressure group urged it act responsibly.

"Mobile phones have valuable and precious materials within them, the mining for which can cause significant environmental harm - and can sometimes be carried out in appalling working conditions in developing countries," said Friends of the Earth's policy director, Mike Childs.

"All phones should be 100% recycled at the end of their lives, or when they have to be returned due to faults.

"The environment shouldn't suffer because of the mistakes of mobile phone firms."


Will owners be compensated for any accessories they bought?

 
Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption Consumers who ordered the Note 7 before its release were given a virtual reality headset

Many consumers bought cases, a Blackberry-styled keyboard cover, a wide-angle lens attachment and spare styluses and power packs for their Note 7s.

A spokesman for Samsung said it was still in discussions with vendors about how to cover these costs.

Some owners are also wondering if they will be offered extra cash for handing back the second-generation Gear VR virtual reality headset that was bundled with pre-orders.

It costs abut £100 to buy separately.

The spokesman said the company considered this to have been a "gift" but did not rule out some kind of additional compensation.


Might Samsung reintroduce removable batteries?

 
Image copyright LG
Image caption LG's G5 handset features a removable battery

Samsung's Galaxy line-up used to distinguish itself against Apple's iPhones by allowing users to take off the phones' backs and swap out their batteries.

But the S6 and Note 5 phones changed that, helping Samsung offer more compact designs with added water resistance as a bonus.

Some people have pointed out Samsung might have avoided its current problems if it had not made that choice.

And it is notable its domestic rival LG has included removable batteries in its two current top-end models.

Unsurprisingly, Samsung would not comment on its future designs.

But one expert said all smartphone-makers would be reviewing their plans.

"There are greater power demands on modern smartphones - they have bigger, higher-resolution screens, faster processors, and 4G data - but there is also greater pressure to keep them very compact and also enable owners to charge them quickly," said Ian Fogg, from IHS.

"Those are competing demands.

"Everyone will be looking at their forthcoming smartphone launches and tasking their engineering teams to have another look at the way their charging and the batteries work to make sure they don't have the same problem.

"And Samsung will be looking at its upcoming models in a particularly close way, as it's possible they were set to share some of the same design elements as the Note 7."

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

 

Samsung chief apologizes for Galaxy Note 7 fiasco, promises to regain customer trust

Posted: , by Cosmin V.

Tags :      

Samsung chief apologizes for Galaxy Note 7 fiasco, promises to regain customer trust
 
Two global recalls of the Galaxy Note 7 have put the Samsung brand under pressure from both investors and customers alike. Although the South Korean company hasn't yet found the cause behind Galaxy Note 7's explosions, it has decided to permanently halt sales and production of the smartphone.

Samsung Electronics' mobile chief vowed to find the exact cause of the defective Galaxy Note 7 units, so the company won't make the same mistake again. He also promised to do everything in his power “to restore trust of consumers so that they can use Samsung products without any safety concerns.”
 
Samsung chief apologizes for Galaxy Note 7 fiasco, promises to regain customer trust
 
 

Many of Mr. Koh Dong-jin's supporters among the company's employees posted messages in favor of Samsung's president, which were meant to boost the morale of other employees. 

Samsung's president thanked all employees who supported him during these tough times and said that he was just as frustrated in the last couple of weeks.

Unfortunately, rumor has it that Samsung Group plans to remove Koh Dong-jing from his leadership position. It remains to be seen whether or not the company's president will get to keep its promise, or Samsung will replace him with someone else before the reason behind the Galaxy Note 7 explosions gets revealed.

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

 
 
 
 

邁入第20屆的日本萬聖變裝遊行「KAWASAKI Halloween」,本周在川崎車站附近熱鬧登場,在眾多人經心設計的裝扮下,有的恐怖、有的搞怪、有的陰森,但其中還有最讓人「害怕」的裝扮

日本網友「aaaya1l1ll021」捕捉到號稱「年度最恐怖萬聖節裝扮」,照片中可見,一隻超大型的三星Note7智慧型手機在街上遊走,螢幕上有多處燒焦痕跡,整隻機身可說是面目全非,試圖營造出今年爆炸頻繁的Note7氛圍。

文章發表後,引起各界關注,也傳至韓國、台灣平台,有網友說「有夠狂」、「哈哈!我承認我笑了」、「手機的細節超級寫實」、「我笑到肚子好痛」、「移動式炸彈的概念」,還有網友擔心侵權問題。

除了日本人扮演大型三星Note7外,國外網友也在臉書上分享自己的「萬聖節最恐怖的變裝」,並打上「這個萬聖節我將會成為一個自爆體!」,只見男子身上黏上6個三星Note7的手機包裝盒,男子拿起管子吹氣,6個盒子紛紛冒出白煙,彷彿隨時要爆炸。

可見今年最恐怖的萬聖變裝,三星Note7將成為年度贏家之一。

▲國外網友在臉書上分享自己的「萬聖節最恐怖的變裝」。(圖/翻攝自臉書)

【川崎ハロウィン】Kawasaki Halloween 2016.10.30 Kawasaki,kangawa,Japan グループA


《網友觀點》Yahoo奇摩新聞歡迎您投稿!對於這個社會大小事有話想說?歡迎各界好手來發聲!用文字表達你的觀點。投稿去---->http://goo.gl/iRPx1B

其他推薦文章
[公告]
如您是安裝IE6、7或其他較舊版本瀏覽器,恐無法使用留言及心情投票。請馬上升級至IEFirefox最新版本,更順暢地使用完整的服務功能。
 
 
【留言區公告】
敬告網友,在留言區發表的言論如被多位網友「檢舉不當使用」,該則留言將會被自動隱藏,也不會顯示在「我的留言」中。請大家一起維持乾淨清新的網路環境。謝謝!
 
 
 
 

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

 

'You can't polish this turd' -- Van Jones on Trump suggesting he may not concede

Updated 0429 GMT (1229 HKT) October 20, 2016

(CNN)CNN contributor Van Jonesoffered his assessment of Wednesday'sthird presidential debate, doing so in colorful fashion.

"You can't polish this turd," suggested Jones, who also noted that it was "a very sad night for the country."
Hosting the wide swath of CNN contributors and political pundits, Anderson Cooper was quick to offer some levity.
"Technically, you can't polish any turd," joked the primetime host.
Jones went on to elaborate on his dismay with Donald Trump's suggestion he might not accept the result of the general election should the voting not go his way.
"What you just got now was the nominee of a major party, for the first time in our history, signaling to the American people that he has so little faith in our institutions ... that he will not stand in front of his own country, in front of his own nation, and say that he respects the process and the outcome," Jones bemoaned. "That is an outrage!"
When asked directly during the debate if he'd accept the results of the presidential election, Trump responded, saying, "I will look at it at the time," and "I'll keep you in suspense."

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

(CNN)Donald Trump on Wednesday refused to say he would accept the result of the presidential election if he loses to Hillary Clinton, raising the possibility of an extraordinary departure from principles that have underpinned American democracy for more than two centuries.

"I will look at it at the time," Trump said when asked during the final presidential debate whether he would concede if he loses on November 8, following his claims that the election is "rigged" against him.
He added: "I will keep you in suspense."
The comments at the Las Vegas showdown marked a stunning moment that has never been seen in the weeks before a modern presidential election. The stance threatens to cast doubt on one of the fundamental principles of American politics -- the peaceful, undisputed transfer of power from one president to a successor who is recognized as legitimate after winning an election.
Trump's debate performance could doom his chance to win over any remaining undecided voters at this late stage in the campaign. His comments about the election results came during a debate in which he spoke of "hombres," language that could offend Latinos. And he referred to Clinton as a "nasty woman."
The election remarks expose a divide with Republican vice presidential nominee Mike Pence, who told CNN's Wolf Blitzer before the debate, "We'll certainly accept the outcome of this election."
Trump's campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, told CNN's Dana Bash after the debate that Trump will "accept the results of the election because he's going to win the election."
Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who is leading Trump in most polls, said her competitor's remarks were "horrifying" and accused him of taking refuge in the idea that any event that turns out against him -- even an Emmy award that goes to a rival -- is "rigged."
"That is not the way our democracy works," Clinton said. "We've been around for 240 years. We have had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what is expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election."
She continued: "He is denigrating -- he's talking down -- our democracy. And I for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position."
Trump's remark about the election result is certain to dominate the aftermath of the debate with only 19 days to go before the election, and it seemed likely to overshadow the GOP's nominee's strongest performance in any of the three presidential debates.
A CNN/ORC instant poll found 52% of debate watchers viewed Clinton as the winner compared to 39% who felt the same about Trump.
Trump didn't have much margin for error going into the debate. He's down eight points in the latest CNN Poll of Polls and is nearly out of time to launch what would have to be one of the most remarkable comebacks of modern times.
A new edition of the CNN electoral map on Wednesday moved two key swing states, Florida and Nevada, to "lean Democrat." Two other states that have voted almost exclusively Republican for decades, Utah and Arizona, are now considered battlegrounds.

Calm start

The showdown began in a more civil and calm way than the two previous debates, in which Trump and Clinton repeatedly flung sharp, bitter jabs at one another. He was far more disciplined for much of the debate, and did his best to avoid taking Clinton's bait, showing restraint as he and Clinton debated the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment, abortion and the economy.
The billionaire reality star-turned-politicians did a better job than in the first two debates of prosecuting Clinton's weaknesses, lambasting her over her record as secretary of state and the controversy over her private email server, and painting her as the symptom of a tired political establishment who had achieved nothing in her 30 years in public life.
But Trump seemed to lose his cool as the debate went on, harshly criticizing Clinton and occasionally getting testy with the debate moderator, Chris Wallace of Fox News. The debate began to take a turn when Trump and Clinton clashed over the Republican nominee's relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Clinton blasted Trump as a "puppet" of Putin and directly called on him to condemn what she said was a Russian effort to use cyberattacks to influence the election in her opponent's favor.
Trump replied that Putin had no respect for Clinton or President Barack Obama.
"That's because he would rather have a puppet as president of the United States," Clinton said, implying that Putin wanted Trump to win the election.
"No puppet. You are the puppet," Trump said.
Trump said he had never met Putin but allowed that the Russian leader had said nice things about him, and said it would be good if Washington and Moscow worked together to fight ISIS.
But he added: "This is not my best friend."
Clinton and Trump also bitterly sparred over the theme of who is qualified to be president. Wallace pressed Trump on why so many women had come forward to accuse him of sexual assault if the allegations were not true.
Trump said the claims had been "largely debunked."
"I think they want either fame or her campaign did it," Trump said, referring to the women that came forward after he said at the last debate that he had never been abusive to any women.
Clinton noted that Trump had implied at several rallies that he could not have made inappropriate advances toward the women because they were not sufficiently attractive.
Trump wrongly denied that he had ever made such a remark.
"Donald thinks belittling women makes him bigger. He goes after their dignity and their self worth," Clinton said.

Treatment of women

Clinton said that Trump's treatment of women was part of pattern of behavior that saw him insult a disabled reporter, go after the parents of a fallen Muslim soldier and question the impartiality of an American judge of Mexican descent.
She said such tactics were in line with a divisive and very "dangerous vision of our country."
 
The tone of the debate -- unusually substantial at the start -- never recovered once the atmosphere became charged. As the event wound down, Clinton said that under her economic plan, the payroll taxes of both herself and Trump would go up to ensure the solvency of Social Security -- unless her rival could figure out a way to avoid paying taxes.
"Such a nasty woman," Trump interjected.

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

(CNN)Donald Trump on Wednesday refused to say he would accept the result of the presidential election if he loses to Hillary Clinton, raising the possibility of an extraordinary departure from principles that have underpinned American democracy for more than two centuries.

"I will look at it at the time," Trump said when asked during the final presidential debate whether he would concede if he loses on November 8, following his claims that the election is "rigged" against him.
He added: "I will keep you in suspense."
The comments at the Las Vegas showdown marked a stunning moment that has never been seen in the weeks before a modern presidential election. The stance threatens to cast doubt on one of the fundamental principles of American politics -- the peaceful, undisputed transfer of power from one president to a successor who is recognized as legitimate after winning an election.
Trump's debate performance could doom his chance to win over any remaining undecided voters at this late stage in the campaign. His comments about the election results came during a debate in which he spoke of "hombres," language that could offend Latinos. And he referred to Clinton as a "nasty woman."
The election remarks expose a divide with Republican vice presidential nominee Mike Pence, who told CNN's Wolf Blitzer before the debate, "We'll certainly accept the outcome of this election."
Trump's campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, told CNN's Dana Bash after the debate that Trump will "accept the results of the election because he's going to win the election."
Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who is leading Trump in most polls, said her competitor's remarks were "horrifying" and accused him of taking refuge in the idea that any event that turns out against him -- even an Emmy award that goes to a rival -- is "rigged."
"That is not the way our democracy works," Clinton said. "We've been around for 240 years. We have had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what is expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election."
She continued: "He is denigrating -- he's talking down -- our democracy. And I for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position."
Trump's remark about the election result is certain to dominate the aftermath of the debate with only 19 days to go before the election, and it seemed likely to overshadow the GOP's nominee's strongest performance in any of the three presidential debates.
A CNN/ORC instant poll found 52% of debate watchers viewed Clinton as the winner compared to 39% who felt the same about Trump.
Trump didn't have much margin for error going into the debate. He's down eight points in the latest CNN Poll of Polls and is nearly out of time to launch what would have to be one of the most remarkable comebacks of modern times.
A new edition of the CNN electoral map on Wednesday moved two key swing states, Florida and Nevada, to "lean Democrat." Two other states that have voted almost exclusively Republican for decades, Utah and Arizona, are now considered battlegrounds.

Calm start

The showdown began in a more civil and calm way than the two previous debates, in which Trump and Clinton repeatedly flung sharp, bitter jabs at one another. He was far more disciplined for much of the debate, and did his best to avoid taking Clinton's bait, showing restraint as he and Clinton debated the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment, abortion and the economy.
The billionaire reality star-turned-politicians did a better job than in the first two debates of prosecuting Clinton's weaknesses, lambasting her over her record as secretary of state and the controversy over her private email server, and painting her as the symptom of a tired political establishment who had achieved nothing in her 30 years in public life.
But Trump seemed to lose his cool as the debate went on, harshly criticizing Clinton and occasionally getting testy with the debate moderator, Chris Wallace of Fox News. The debate began to take a turn when Trump and Clinton clashed over the Republican nominee's relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Clinton blasted Trump as a "puppet" of Putin and directly called on him to condemn what she said was a Russian effort to use cyberattacks to influence the election in her opponent's favor.
Trump replied that Putin had no respect for Clinton or President Barack Obama.
"That's because he would rather have a puppet as president of the United States," Clinton said, implying that Putin wanted Trump to win the election.
"No puppet. You are the puppet," Trump said.
Trump said he had never met Putin but allowed that the Russian leader had said nice things about him, and said it would be good if Washington and Moscow worked together to fight ISIS.
But he added: "This is not my best friend."
Clinton and Trump also bitterly sparred over the theme of who is qualified to be president. Wallace pressed Trump on why so many women had come forward to accuse him of sexual assault if the allegations were not true.
Trump said the claims had been "largely debunked."
"I think they want either fame or her campaign did it," Trump said, referring to the women that came forward after he said at the last debate that he had never been abusive to any women.
Clinton noted that Trump had implied at several rallies that he could not have made inappropriate advances toward the women because they were not sufficiently attractive.
Trump wrongly denied that he had ever made such a remark.
"Donald thinks belittling women makes him bigger. He goes after their dignity and their self worth," Clinton said.

Treatment of women

Clinton said that Trump's treatment of women was part of pattern of behavior that saw him insult a disabled reporter, go after the parents of a fallen Muslim soldier and question the impartiality of an American judge of Mexican descent.
She said such tactics were in line with a divisive and very "dangerous vision of our country."
 
The tone of the debate -- unusually substantial at the start -- never recovered once the atmosphere became charged. As the event wound down, Clinton said that under her economic plan, the payroll taxes of both herself and Trump would go up to ensure the solvency of Social Security -- unless her rival could figure out a way to avoid paying taxes.
"Such a nasty woman," Trump interjected.

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

研究員從1萬多人身上發現:媽媽基因決定小孩聰不聰明,爸爸基因決定小孩的性慾、食慾...

圖片來源:dreamstime

母親懷胎十月,對嬰兒的影響也比父親來得大,尤其是智商。最新研究發現,X染色體帶有智商基因,因為女性有兩個X染色體,男性只有一個,因此孩子的智商基因比較有可能來自母親。此外,遺傳自父親的認知功能基因有可能會自動關閉。

英國獨立報(The Indenpent)報導刊登在 Psychology Spot 上的一篇綜合研究指出,在眾多被歸類為能被訓練的基因(conditioned genes)當中,有些基因是在來自母系遺傳的才能運作,有些是限定來自男性遺傳,而智商被認為是其中一種必須來自母親才能運作的基因。

這項實驗室內的研究是使用遺傳修正的老鼠,被施以更多母親基因劑量的老鼠頭和腦更大,但身體比較小,但被施以更多父親基因的老鼠腦較小,身體比較大。

研究人員在控制飲食到記憶等不同認知功能的老鼠大腦六大區塊,發現母親或父親基因的細胞,父親基金的細胞累積在涉及諸如性、食物、侵略等邊緣系統,但沒有在大腦皮層發現任何父親基因細胞,大腦皮層是控制重要認知功能如推理、思考、語言、計畫的區域。而母親的基因細胞直接進入大腦皮層。

考慮到人與老鼠的不同,研究人員採用更人性的方法來探索智商,發現老鼠實驗的推論也可證實在人類身上,他們從1994年開始,每年訪問14~22歲年輕人,共訪問了12,686位,去除掉教育程度與社會經濟地位的不同,發現智商仍遺傳自母親。

但研究人員強調,遺傳機率只有40~60%,其他來自環境因素。但母親在非基因部分也扮演重要角色,有些研究發現母親與孩子在智商發展上有親密關係。華盛頓大學研究發現母親與孩子的情感連結是大腦發育過程中重要的因素,研究人員花7年時間觀察發現,有母親的情感支持以及智力需求被滿足的小孩,13歲時的海馬體比沒有母親在側的小孩大10%,海馬體是控制關聯記憶、學習、壓力回應的區域。

與母親的強連結,會給孩子更多安全感,讓他們去探索世界,以及解決問題的自信,此外,盡責、有信心的母親會幫孩子解決問題,進一步幫他們去發揮潛力。

現在還不知道為何父親沒辦法如母親一樣扮演育兒角色,但研究人員提出其他基因決定的特徵,像是直覺洞察力與情緒,可能遺傳自父親,而這些特質也會成為解開智力潛能的鑰匙。

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

三星狼狽停產Note7,電池爆不停的「幕後元凶」

年銷量超過3億支、全球智慧型手機霸主三星,正因為一款手機連環爆,狼狽不堪。從8月Note7開賣,到10月10日宣布全球停售,兩個月的時間,三星營業利益估計損失超過1600億元,還將面對難以彌補的商譽損失。

集邦科技分析師呂理舜指出,因鋰電池爆炸對生命財產會造成傷害,所以廠商檢驗嚴格,一般零組件如機殼,對良率並無絕對要求,對科技產品的鋰電池,良率則是100萬顆只允許10顆以下出問題。但三星Note7爆炸起碼35起,發生比率是百萬分之二十四,遠超過一般業界標準一倍多。

身為市值超過新台幣7兆元、全球企業排行前30名的三星,怎麼會犯下這種不可思議的錯?

禍根一:生魚片理論
「搶先」法則成了緊箍咒

原因在於,三星內部信仰的兩大法則「生魚片理論」和「鯰魚理論」,這是其成功原因,但也是爆炸事件的禍根。

曾讓三星起死回生的功臣、三星前執行長尹鐘龍提出的生魚片理論主張:如果你在海裡釣到一條高檔的魚,趁新鮮可以到頂級日本料理店,當生魚片賣個好價錢,但晚一天,就只能以一半的價格賣到二流餐廳,再晚一天,只能賣四分之一價格,最後變成不值錢的魚乾,所以,產品要趁還是新鮮「生魚片」時,趕快賣出去。

生魚片理論,曾為三星帶來巨大的成功。2011年,三星先看準消費者對大尺寸螢幕手機的需求,推出5.3吋大螢幕的Note,那時蘋果因創辦人賈伯斯立下規則,堅持不做大螢幕手機,推出的iPhone 4S螢幕仍只有3.5吋,這給予三星可乘之機,穩站智慧型手機的冠軍寶座,蘋果往後只能屈居第二。

但當蘋果執行長庫克掌權,打破賈伯斯規則,推出大螢幕手機,三星習慣性的再想新點子。這次,它看準蘋果在電池容量上態度保守,想在「電池」上「超車」。

「鋰電池不能當半導體玩!」據了解,在三星鋰電池爆炸前,大型電池廠的主管已警告,鋰電池是「化學材料」,除非更換配方,否則在手機上所使用的鋰電池,在效能和成本上已經逼近極限。

產業分析師表示,其實蘋果早測試過高能量密度的鋰電池,但怕爆炸,不敢貿然採用。「三星為了超越蘋果,結果衝到懸崖邊,一腳不小心踩空就掉下去了,」他表示。

禍根二:鯰魚理論
為擺脫天敵,急提升規格

三星信奉的鯰魚理論主張:如果希望泥鰍長得更快、肉更結實,那就在池子裡放隻他們的天敵:鯰魚,處在生死存亡邊緣的泥鰍,會不斷想辦法活動求生,而更肉質肥美。

雖然現在,三星在智慧型手機市占率全世界第一,乍看之下沒有天敵,但中國手機廠包括華為、小米、OPPO等,已變成緊咬三星不放的「鯰魚群」。它們不但價格低,連規格都不差,手裡還握有中國這片市場。

三星的售價無法比中國廠商更低,這讓其更急於在外觀與規格上明顯提升。所以,Note7不但電池容量高,還想把所有「優點」都放進一款手機,快速充電、曲面螢幕等,應有盡有。每一項功能分開來看都很美好,合在一起卻讓電池過熱,更加速電池爆炸的風險。

三星繳了1600億元學費所換得的一堂冒險課,也值得我們所有人深思。

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

4年市值增57% 最強女CEO獨家告白

今年9月,《財富》雜誌評選全球前50大女企業家,年僅37歲,寶成集團執行長蔡佩君恰巧以第37名出線,同時也是台灣唯一代表。稍早在今年4月,富比世評選的全球前50大女強人中,蔡佩君也是台灣唯二入選的女企業家。

40多年來,寶成集團一直是全球最大的製鞋代工廠,全世界每5雙鞋子就有一雙是出自寶成之手,每個家庭打開鞋櫃,很難沒有一雙寶成製造的鞋子;但對「鐵血公主」蔡佩君而言,她更在意另一件事:在中國經營運動用品通路的寶勝國際,營運苦撐多年,在今年終於一舉突破,上半年獲利突破19億,全年預估獲利突破40億,雖然只佔全集團3成,卻是她堅持多年、奮力轉型的亮麗成果。

「我希望有一天能達到『製鞋』和『零售』一半一半,甚至有個夢想,寶勝比裕元(寶成集團的製鞋公司)大很多,」中秋節過後,蔡佩君率領主要幹部,接受《今周刊》採訪團隊獨家專訪時,她綻開笑容說。

蔡佩君心裡很清楚,中國消費市場崛起之後,零售通路將是未來另一個賺錢引擎;此外,她更重要的盤算在於,看著爸爸一輩子做代工,就算做到全球最大,有「鞋王」之稱,還是要處處「尊重」各品牌的「指導」,只有掌握通路,才能爭取更大空間。

蔡佩君的800天 最甜蜜也最艱辛的日子

與2014年接受《今周刊》專訪相比,眼前笑容綻放的蔡佩君,在過去的800天裡,歷練更深了,不僅經歷了寶成成立40多年來最大的風浪;同一時間,她的人生也歷經戀愛、結婚、生子,從一個蔡其瑞最疼愛的女兒,快速蛻變成為母愛滿溢、卻更顯包容溫暖的人妻、人母,過去這段日子是她人生中最咬牙艱辛、卻也最甜蜜的時刻。

2014年,她接下集團執行長大位後不久,就面對寶成史上最大員工暴動,當時中國東莞的工人力爭提撥社保金(社會保險),發動示威,身為當地最大台商的寶成首當其衝。抗爭才弭平,越南廠接著也發生暴動,她躲開鎂光燈,悄悄地親飛第一線,與當地政府協商、談判、折衝。
    
不僅如此,還有同業不斷的攻訐,「寶成掉單了!」、「未來要提列社保金、幫員工加薪,都讓人事成本大增,會大幅侵蝕寶成的獲利」,這些負面的耳語不斷,這家全球最大老牌製鞋廠的營運,正面臨前所未有的艱困。

三把大刀走出泥沼 寶勝交出亮眼成績

面對眼前逆風,蔡佩君除了挺身迎戰,還要改造寶勝,帶動寶成轉型:而在2012年8月接任寶勝總經理的關赫德,成為蔡佩君改造藍圖中的關鍵人物。

當時為了趕搭08年北京奧運風潮,寶勝在同年匆促上市,迅速在中國境內併購大量據點,但在擴張過程中,也承受許多爛帳,例如簽下多年高價租金合約等,拖垮了寶勝的獲利。關赫德上任,第一件事就是下令快速清理當年掛牌上市留下的爛帳。

此外,寶勝內部資訊電腦系統紊亂,關赫德立刻進行系統整合,逐一檢查每一據點的長短期獲利能力,關掉不必要的據點,最多時一年就關掉近千家據點。另外他推動區總經理制,把全中國劃分為20多個區,並設立區總經理,從中階幹部中選出一批平均年紀不到40歲的「區總」,每人平均主管400多家據點,改造寶勝體質。

但製鞋,才是寶成集團的本業;相較寶勝約2.5萬名員工的管理改造,佔7成營收、約45萬名員工的製鞋本業,如何革新,更是蔡佩君念茲在茲的更大挑戰。

《今周刊》在「鐵血公主」專題中曾報導,蔡佩君上任後破除寶成多年的「軍頭式領導文化」,大砍2位總經理、調動近百位經理人,造成業內大震撼,「鐵血」一詞不逕而走。

過去800天中,蔡佩君除了撤換經理人,創業的上一代,從爸爸蔡其瑞到所有的叔叔、大堂哥蔡乃峰等,都陸續退休,取而代之的是包括策略投資副總李韶午、寶剩總經理關赫德、負責人資管理改造的人資長胡嘉和、新上任的NIKE事業群總經理劉鴻志,以及唯一的家族代表、叔叔蔡其建的長子蔡明倫。這群人平均年齡不到50歲,正式取代過去平均超過65歲的高齡團隊。

質變改造寶成  股價市值雙創新高

除了人事更動,經營制度的改變更是翻天覆地,除了引進KPI考核制度,更希望透過共識營等方式,要求所有員工了解公司核心價值。

「我們每人都要提出自己3年、5年後的接班人選,並且提出具體的傳承計畫,」一位在寶成越南廠區的中階幹部證實,過去講義氣、講人情的「摸頭式管理」不再,取而代之的是2年一次的主管輪調。

而蔡佩君的改造大計,就像滴水穿石,一點一滴讓這家全球最大鞋廠產生「質變」。今年以來,寶成的營收幾乎月月創新高,而這800天來,寶成的股價漲幅25%,若從蔡佩君接班以來起算,漲幅超過7成,今年9月底,寶成集團市值正式突破4千億元大關,是成立46年來最顛峰的時刻。

800天後,這位總舵手已經越來越得心應手,她臉上的笑容給了一切改革的答案。但未來的挑戰仍劇,這笑容能不能持續下去,或許還需要更長時間的觀察。

Happy Face 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Close

您尚未登入,將以訪客身份留言。亦可以上方服務帳號登入留言

請輸入暱稱 ( 最多顯示 6 個中文字元 )

請輸入標題 ( 最多顯示 9 個中文字元 )

請輸入內容 ( 最多 140 個中文字元 )

reload

請輸入左方認證碼:

看不懂,換張圖

請輸入驗證碼